William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
OH, I'M JUST SO ASHAMED, AREN'T YOU? – AT 10:47 A.M. ET: The Politico informs us of the dismay expressed by an American diplomat over things his embarrassing countrymen have said:
COMMENT: Well whoop-dee-do. I'm so distressed that there's puzzlement. Maybe some of the "puzzled" should look beyond their left-wing, politically correct newspapers and realize there's a real debate going on, and that serious scientists are expressing skepticism over "global warming" – excuse me, I meant to use the more stylish "climate change." We want to be fashionable here. The issue is not whether there is climate change. The climate is always changing a bit. The issue is whether we should commit trillions of dollars to strategies based on unproved assumptions, projections and doomsday scenarios. That is a discussion we must have, with or without the permission of our diplomats or their overseas constituencies. Stern's patronizing observation reminds me of the story, which we've told here before, of our great former secretary of state, George Shultz. When a new ambassador was appointed, Shultz would call him or her in, take the appointee to a map, and ask, "What is your country?" The appointee would inevitably point to some nation overseas. "No," Shultz would reply, pointing to the United States, "that is your country." We will have our debate here. November 20, 2010 |
|